Numerous studies of U.S. markets have shown that stock selection models have been able to isolate securities that earn returns above those predicted by a simple market model. Models examining the relation between analyst expectations and returns have been particularly useful. Unexpected earnings, changes in analysts' earnings-per-share forecasts, the number of analysts revising their forecasts-all these measures have been found to be useful in predicting abnormal returns in U.S. equity markets. At least two of these measures-changes in analysts' EPS forecasts and the number of analysts changing their forecasts-are also related to abnormal returns in several international markets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anthony Bercel (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: