Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The clinical utility of radionuclide emission tomography of the kidney in comparison with conventional gamma-camera imaging has been assessed from scans of 60 patients suspected of having space-occupying lesions of the kidney. Nineteen patients had renal tumour, 17 had cysts and seven had renal pseudotumours; the remainder had no lesion. Objective trials using four observers showed only a slight, statistically insignificant advantage from the addition of tomographic sections to conventional images. However, in several individual cases tomography had aided diagnosis, particularly in obese patients, when an alternative non-invasive investigation (ultrasonography) was inconclusive. In seven patients a positive diagnosis of renal pseudotumour was made possible by tomography; definite identification of ectopic functioning cortical tissue at the location of a mass suspected after urography was considered to be a distinct diagnostic advantage gained from emission tomography of the kidney.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: