A set S ⊂ {0,1}* is sparse if there is a polynomial p such that the number of strings in S of size at most n is at most p(n). All known NP-complete sets, such as SAT, are not sparse. The main result of this paper is that if there is a sparse NP-complete set under many-one reductions, then P = NP. We also show that if there is a sparse NP-complete set under Turing reductions, then the polynomial time hierarchy collapses to Δ2P.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephen R. Mahaney (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: