Key result
NOACs outperform VKAs for AF stroke prevention, and rivaroxaban plus aspirin lowers CVD stroke risk.
Why the study?
The role of NOACs in patients with AF and comorbidities, prior ESUS, and atherosclerosis remained less clear than in the general AF population.
Do NOACs prevent stroke and cardiovascular events across different patient populations including AF, ESUS, and atherosclerotic vascular disease?
Do NOACs prevent stroke and cardiovascular events across different patient populations including AF, ESUS, and atherosclerotic vascular disease?
NOACs provide effective stroke prevention in AF with comorbidities and in atherosclerotic disease when combined with aspirin, though their role in unselected ESUS remains neutral.
Multiple randomized controlled trials and many real-world evidence studies have consistently shown that non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are preferable to vitamin K antagonists for thromboembolic stroke prevention in the majority of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, their role in the management of patients with AF and comorbidities, as well as in other patient populations with a high risk of stroke, such as patients with prior embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) and those with atherosclerosis, is less clear. There is now increasing evidence suggesting that NOACs have a beneficial effect in the prevention of stroke in patients with AF and comorbidities, such as renal impairment and diabetes. In addition, while studies investigating the efficacy and safety of NOACs for the prevention of secondary stroke in patients with a history of ESUS demonstrated neutral results, subanalyses suggested potential benefits in certain subgroups of patients with ESUS. One NOAC, rivaroxaban, has also recently been found to be effective in reducing the risk of stroke in patients with chronic cardiovascular disease including coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease, further broadening the patient groups that may benefit from NOACs. In this article, we will review recent evidence for the use of NOACs across the stroke spectrum in detail, and discuss the progress and future prospects in the different stroke areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camm et al. (2021) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation, embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), and atherosclerotic vascular disease. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or aspirin was evaluated. NOACs are preferable to vitamin K antagonists for stroke prevention in most patients with atrial fibrillation, and rivaroxaban plus aspirin reduces stroke risk in cardiovascular disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: