Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a hierarchical and compositional scene layout (i.e., spatial configuration) representation and a method of learning reconfigurable model for scene categorization. Three types of shape primitives (i.e., triangle, parallelogram, and trapezoid), called tans, are used to tile scene image lattice in a hierarchical and compositional way, and a directed acyclic AND-OR graph (AOG) is proposed to organize the overcomplete dictionary of tan instances placed in image lattice, exploring a very large number of scene layouts. With certain off-the-shelf appearance features used for grounding terminal-nodes (i.e., tan instances) in the AOG, a scene layout is represented by the globally optimal parse tree learned via a dynamic programming algorithm from the AOG, which we call tangram model. Then, a scene category is represented by a mixture of tangram models discovered with an exemplar-based clustering method. On basis of the tangram model, we address scene categorization in two aspects: 1) building a tangram bank representation for linear classifiers, which utilizes a collection of tangram models learned from all categories and 2) building a tangram matching kernel for kernel-based classification, which accounts for all hidden spatial configurations in the AOG. In experiments, our methods are evaluated on three scene data sets for both the configuration-level and semantic-level scene categorization, and outperform the spatial pyramid model consistently.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: