Key result
The autocorrelation function method achieved higher accuracy (89.5%) than the fast Fourier transform method (81.2%) for rhythm analysis of body surface potential mapping signals in atrial fibrillation patients.
Why the study?
Does the autocorrelation function method accurately analyze BSPM signals and predict recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=10)
No
Does the autocorrelation function method accurately analyze BSPM signals and predict recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 89.5% vs 81.2%
Autocorrelation function analysis of BSPM signals is a promising noninvasive method for accurate rhythm analysis and prediction of AF recurrence in patients with persistent AF.
Hypothesis-generating for autocorrelation of BSPM signals in persistent AF; leaves open validation for recurrence prediction before clinical use.
The study of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been known as a hot topic of clinical concern. Body surface potential mapping (BSPM), a noninvasive electrical mapping technology, has been widely used in the study of AF. This study adopted 10 AF patients' preoperative and postoperative BSPM data (each patient's data contained 128 channels), and applied the autocorrelation function method to obtain the activation interval of the BSPM signals. The activation interval results were compared with that of manual counting method and the applicability of the autocorrelation function method was verified. Furthermore, we compared the autocorrelation function method with the commonly used fast Fourier transform (FFT) method. It was found that the autocorrelation function method was more accurate. Finally, to find a simple rule to predict the recurrence of atrial fibrillation, the autocorrelation function method was used to analyze the preoperative BSPM signals of 10 patients with persistent AF. Consequently, we found that if the patient's proportion of channels with dominant frequency larger than 2.5 Hz in the anterior left region is greater than the other three regions (the anterior right region, the posterior left region, and the posterior right region), he or she might have a higher possibility of AF recurrence. This study verified the rationality of the autocorrelation function method for rhythm analysis and concluded a simple rule of AF recurrence prediction based on this method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=10). Autocorrelation function method vs. Fast Fourier transform (FFT) method was evaluated on Accuracy of activation interval detection compared to manual counting. The autocorrelation function method achieved higher accuracy (89.5%) than the fast Fourier transform method (81.2%) for rhythm analysis of body surface potential mapping signals in atrial fibrillation patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: