Key result
Noninvasive cardiac electrical imaging reconstructed atrial activation sequences from single beats that correlated well with clinical endocardial findings using CARTO (CC = 0.70).
Why the study?
Does noninvasive cardiac electrical imaging accurately reconstruct atrial activation sequences compared to invasive mapping in patients with atrial flutter and normal rhythm?
Observational (n=7)
Open-label
Yes
Does noninvasive cardiac electrical imaging accurately reconstruct atrial activation sequences compared to invasive mapping in patients with atrial flutter and normal rhythm?
Noninvasive cardiac electrical imaging using body surface potential maps can accurately reconstruct complex atrial reentrant and focal activation patterns, correlating well with invasive electrophysiological mapping.
Supports proof-of-concept for noninvasive atrial mapping; leaves open larger validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of atrial electrophysiological properties is crucial for clinical intervention of atrial arrhythmias and the investigation of the underlying mechanism. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of a novel noninvasive cardiac electrical imaging technique in imaging bi-atrial activation sequences from body surface potential maps (BSPMs). METHODS: The study includes 7 subjects, with 3 atrial flutter patients, and 4 healthy subjects with normal atrial activations. The subject-specific heart-torso geometries were obtained from MRI/CT images. The equivalent current densities were reconstructed from 208-channel BSPMs by solving the inverse problem using individual heart-torso geometry models. The activation times were estimated from the time instant corresponding to the highest peak in the time course of the equivalent current densities. To evaluate the performance, a total of 32 cycles of atrial flutter were analyzed. The imaged activation maps obtained from single beats were compared with the average maps and the activation maps measured from CARTO, by using correlation coefficient (CC) and relative error (RE). RESULTS: The cardiac electrical imaging technique is capable of imaging both focal and reentrant activations. The imaged activation maps for normal atrial activations are consistent with findings from isolated human hearts. Activation maps for isthmus-dependent counterclockwise reentry were reconstructed on three patients with typical atrial flutter. The method was capable of imaging macro counterclockwise reentrant loop in the right atrium and showed inter-atria electrical conduction through coronary sinus. The imaged activation sequences obtained from single beats showed good correlation with both the average activation maps (CC = 0.91±0.03, RE = 0.29±0.05) and the clinical endocardial findings using CARTO (CC = 0.70±0.04, RE = 0.42±0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The noninvasive cardiac electrical imaging technique is able to reconstruct complex atrial reentrant activations and focal activation patterns in good consistency with clinical electrophysiological mapping. It offers the potential to assist in radio-frequency ablation of atrial arrhythmia and help defining the underlying arrhythmic mechanism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Atrial flutter and normal sinus rhythm (n=7). Noninvasive cardiac electrical imaging (CEI) vs. CARTO electroanatomic mapping was evaluated on Correlation coefficient (CC) between imaged activation maps and CARTO maps. Noninvasive cardiac electrical imaging reconstructed atrial activation sequences from single beats that correlated well with clinical endocardial findings using CARTO (CC = 0.70).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: