Key result
High ED congestion linked to fewer real-time tests and more EHR reliance without increasing revisits.
Why the study?
The information acquisition process regarding a patient's status and the impact of high system workload on medical service quality under ED congestion remained to be examined.
How does emergency department congestion affect physicians' reliance on EHR versus real-time medical tests?
Observational (n=1,400,000)
How does emergency department congestion affect physicians' reliance on EHR versus real-time medical tests?
EHRs provide an indirect benefit in congested EDs by allowing physicians to safely reduce time-consuming medical tests without increasing patient revisit rates.
ED congestion was associated with greater EHR reliance and fewer tests without higher revisits; leaves open causal effects and generalizability.
We examine the information acquisition process regarding a patient's status under emergency department (ED) congestion conditions. We focus on two key information channels: 1) Electronic Health Record (EHR) that provide the patient's medical history and 2) Medical tests conducted in real-time. Whereas the EHR provides the physician with easily accessible information with little delay, real-time medical tests can provide more current information, but are time-consuming. We examine physicians' decisions in cases of ED congestion, using a dataset that includes more than 1.4 million visits. When congestion is low, the information channels are complementary - acquiring information from the EHR is positively correlated with information acquisition from the medical tests channel, representing an incentive for the physician to acquire all possible information before providing diagnosis. However, as the congestion increases, there is less reliance on medical tests; this effect is amplified when EHR information is used. To avoid excessive congestion, physicians apparently refrain from sending patients for medical tests, and compensate for loss of information using EHR information. The impact of high system workload on the quality of medical service is an essential concern for managers; we show the indirect benefit of investment in EHRs through reduced blood-tests without increasing revisit rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ben‐Assuli et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Emergency department congestion (n=1,400,000). Electronic Health Record (EHR) use vs. Real-time medical tests was evaluated on Information acquisition from medical tests and revisit rates. In an analysis of >1.4 million ED visits, high congestion led physicians to rely more on Electronic Health Records and reduce real-time medical tests, without increasing patient revisit rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: