Key result
Interval training yields ~12% higher peak lactate and greater heart rate alterations than continuous pacing.
Why the study?
The study aimed to compare the physiological responses, specifically post-exercise cardiac autonomic regulation and lactate, of high-intensity race-pace continuous versus interval workouts commonly used in middle-distance athletics.
Does interval training compared to continuous workout alter post-exercise cardiac autonomic regulation and lactate in highly trained runners?
RCT (n=19)
Counterbalanced and randomized
Does interval training compared to continuous workout alter post-exercise cardiac autonomic regulation and lactate in highly trained runners?
Interval training induces a greater alteration of heart rate dynamics and higher post-exercise peak lactate compared to continuous race-pace workouts in highly trained runners.
May guide post-exercise recovery monitoring in athletes; extends RCT evidence on interval vs continuous effects on autonomic regulation.
Purpose: The present study aimed to compare the physiological responses of high-intensity race-pace continuous vs. interval workouts commonly used in middle-distance athletics, by means of analyzing post-exercise cardiac autonomic regulation and lactate. Methods: Nineteen highly-trained 800-m male runners were asked to run a 600-m race-pace continuous workout and a 2 × 4 × 200-m interval training, counterbalanced and randomized within one week of difference. Blood lactate jointly with linear and nonlinear heart rate dynamics were assessed during the immediate 15-min recovery. Age-category (Under23-Senior vs. Juvenile-Junior) was considered as an inter-subject factor. Results: Peak lactate was higher following the interval training (15.51 ± 0.99 vs 13.83 ± 1.77 mmol L-1; P < 0.05) whereas lactate removal was almost nonexistent 15 min after both workouts (between 0 and 16%). Vagal modulation (ln RMSSD and lnRMSSD to RR ratio) remained significantly depressed at the end of recovery following both workouts, although the alteration was larger following the interval training. Detrended Fluctuation Analysis evidenced a more random HR behavior (DFA1 closer to 0.5) during the first 9 min of recovery after the interval training, whereas no significant change was observed in heart rate complexity (SampEn). Neither were differences found in post-exercise lactate and HR dynamics as a function of age-category. Conclusions: High-intensity workouts commonly used in middle-distance athletics, both race-pace continuous and intervallic approaches, induce a large depression of vagal modulation in highly trained runners, although interval trainings appear to induce even a greater alteration of both linear and nonlinear HR dynamics and a higher post-exercise peak lactate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez‐Navarro et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Highly trained athletes (n=19). Interval training (2 × 4 × 200-m) vs. Continuous workout (600-m race-pace) was evaluated on Peak lactate (p=<0.05). Interval training induced a higher peak lactate (15.51 vs 13.83 mmol/L; P<0.05) and greater alteration of heart rate dynamics compared to a continuous race-pace workout in highly trained runners.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: