Key result
Spironolactone did not reduce arterial stiffness (CAVI mean difference 0.25; 95% CI -0.3 to 0.5; P=0.080) compared to doxazosin in patients at risk or with type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
To evaluate whether spironolactone or dietary nitrate from beetroot juice could reduce arterial stiffness independently of blood pressure.
Does spironolactone or dietary nitrate reduce arterial stiffness independently of blood pressure in people at risk or with type-2 diabetes?
RCT
Double-blind
Factorial
Does spironolactone or dietary nitrate reduce arterial stiffness independently of blood pressure in people at risk or with type-2 diabetes?
In patients at risk for or with type 2 diabetes, neither spironolactone nor dietary nitrate reduced arterial stiffness, though dietary nitrate selectively lowered central systolic pressure.
Spironolactone should not be used to target arterial stiffness in type 2 diabetes; challenges mineralocorticoid antagonism as a BP-independent vascular therapy.
AIMS: To test if spironolactone or dietary nitrate from beetroot juice could reduce arterial stiffness as aortic pulse wave velocity (PWVart), a potential treatment target, independently of blood pressure. METHODS: Daily spironolactone (≤50 mg) vs doxazosin (control ≤16 mg) and 70 mL beetroot juice (Beet-It ≤11 mmol nitrate) vs nitrate-depleted juice (placebo; 0 mmol nitrate) were tested in people at risk or with type-2 diabetes using a double-blind, 6-month factorial trial. Vascular indices (baseline, 12, 24 weeks) were cardiac-ankle vascular index (CAVI), a nominally pressure-independent stiffness measure (primary outcome), PWVart secondary, central systolic pressure and augmentation. Analysis was intention-to-treat, adjusted for systolic pressure differences between trial arms. RESULTS: Spironolactone did not reduce stiffness, with evidence for reduced CAVI on doxazosin rather than spironolactone (mean difference [95% confidence interval]; 0.25 [-0.3, 0.5] units, P = .080), firmer for PWVart (0.37 [0.01, 0.7] m/s, P = .045). There was no difference in systolic pressure reduction between spironolactone and doxazosin (0.7 [-4.8, 3.3] mmHg, P = .7). Circulating nitrate and nitrite increased on active vs placebo juice, with central systolic pressure lowered -2.6 [-4.5, - 0.8] mmHg, P = .007 more on the active juice, but did not reduce CAVI, PWVart or peripheral pressure. Change in nitrate and nitrite concentrations were 1.5-fold [1.1-2.2] and 2.2-fold [1.3, 3.6] higher on spironolactone than on doxazosin respectively; both P < .05. CONCLUSION: Contrary to our hypothesis, in at-risk/type 2 diabetes patients, spironolactone did not reduce arterial stiffness, rather PWVart was lower on doxazosin. Dietary nitrate elevated plasma nitrite, selectively lowering central systolic pressure, observed previously for nitrite.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mills et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in At risk or with type-2 diabetes. Spironolactone and dietary nitrate (beetroot juice) vs. Doxazosin (≤16 mg) and nitrate-depleted juice (0 mmol nitrate) was evaluated on Cardiac-ankle vascular index (CAVI) (Mean difference 0.25, 95% CI -0.3 to 0.5, p=0.080). Spironolactone did not reduce arterial stiffness (CAVI mean difference 0.25; 95% CI -0.3 to 0.5; P=0.080) compared to doxazosin in patients at risk or with type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: