Key result
Using left ventricular ejection fraction <30%-35% as the primary indication for ICD implantation has limitations, as it lacks a direct mechanistic link to ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
Why the study?
Does ejection fraction <30%-35% adequately risk-stratify patients with coronary disease and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy for primary prevention ICD implantation?
Does ejection fraction <30%-35% adequately risk-stratify patients with coronary disease and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy for primary prevention ICD implantation?
Relying solely on LVEF <30-35% for primary prevention ICD implantation is limited, as it fails to capture all patients at high risk for sudden death and lacks a direct mechanistic link to ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reliance on LVEF thresholds warrants caution for primary-prevention ICDs; leaves open development of mechanistic, arrhythmia-specific stratification.
Current guidelines for use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary disease and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy are based primarily on ejection fraction (EF) <30%-35%. The origin of this is based on EF as the common variable in several randomized clinical trials evaluating the ability of ICDs to reduce mortality. However, although low EF identifies one patient population at relatively increased risk for sudden death, there are a number of limitations to use of EF as the primary indication for ICD. Patients with low EF are not uniform with regard to other prognostic markers, and not all are at high risk for sudden death. Conversely, although patients with EF >35% as a group are at lower risk for sudden death, these patients are not uniform with regard to other prognostic variables. A variety of tests, including measures of reduced repolarization reserve and measures of altered sympathetic/parasympathetic balance, have identified patients with EF >35% at relatively high risk for sudden death. One explanation for this "disconnect" is that there is no evidence of any direct mechanistic link between low EF and mechanisms responsible for ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buxton et al. (2010) conducted a review in Coronary disease and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) was evaluated. Using left ventricular ejection fraction <30%-35% as the primary indication for ICD implantation has limitations, as it lacks a direct mechanistic link to ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: