Key result
Stroke prevention guidelines for recent MI, HFrEF, or LV thrombus rely heavily on expert opinion.
Why the study?
To review the evidence regarding stroke and recent myocardial infarction, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular thrombus, and wall motion abnormalities.
This review highlights that while anticoagulation is beneficial for established left ventricular thrombus, its routine use is not supported for reduced ejection fraction or wall motion abnormalities without thrombus.
May support withholding routine anticoagulation without LV thrombus; leaves open optimal stroke prevention strategies pending RCTs.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the evidence regarding stroke and recent myocardial infarction (MI), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular thrombus (LVT), and wall motion abnormalities (WMA). RECENT FINDINGS: The risk of ischemic stroke associated with acute MI has been greatly reduced with reperfusion treatments that improved myocardium salvage. Acute ischemic stroke is an uncommon complication of diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. For established LVT, anticoagulation is superior to antiplatelet medications to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. The duration of anticoagulation should be at least 3 to 6 months. Direct oral anticoagulants have been used off-label in this context. In patients with low ejection fraction or WMA, there is no evidence that anticoagulation is superior to antiplatelet treatment in preventing ischemic stroke. In patients with ischemic stroke and recent MI (< 3 months), type of MI (STEMI or NSTEMI), timing, and location should be considered when deciding whether intravenous thrombolysis should be used for stroke treatment. Mechanical thrombectomy should be considered as a therapeutic alternative to intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion and recent MI. Most guidelines regarding prevention of ischemic stroke in patients with these cardiac causes of stroke are derived from expert opinion. There is a need for high quality evidence to support stroke prevention treatments in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ana Catarina Fonseca (2023) conducted a review in Ischemic stroke associated with recent myocardial infarction, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular thrombus, and wall motion abnormalities. Current guidelines for preventing ischemic stroke in patients with recent myocardial infarction, reduced ejection fraction, or left ventricular thrombus are largely based on expert opinion, highlighting a need for high-quality clinical trials.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: