Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
After reviewing literature detailing the ubiquity of error in research and assessment data, I describe mistakes found with MMPI-2 and Rorschach scores in an earlier publication (Meyer, 1993). The mistakes emerged from several sources, including hand-scoring the assessment measures, manually retrieving scores from patient files, and manually entering information for statistical analyses. The proportion of erroneous scores in the original study (MMPI-2 = 5.88%, Rorschach = 1.56%) was relatively small and reliability coefficients between the original and corrected scales were uniformly high (i.e., > .940). Consequently, the findings detailed in the original publication were not greatly affected by the mistakes that were made. Nonetheless, because this will not always be the case, I discuss the discrepancies as a way to sensitize researchers, clinicians, and students to the presence of error and then suggest several strategies for minimizing its impact on assessment data and research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gregory J. Meyer (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: