Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The maintenance of power distribution lines is critically challenged by vegetation encroachment, posing significant risks to the reliability and safety of power utilities. Traditional manual inspection methods are resource-intensive and lack the precision required for effective and proactive maintenance. This paper presents an automated, accurate, and efficient approach to vegetation management near power lines by leveraging advancements in LiDAR as a remote sensing technology and deep learning algorithms. The RandLA-Net model is employed for semantic segmentation of large-scale point clouds to accurately identify vegetation, poles, and power lines. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis is conducted to optimize the model’s hyperparameters, enhancing segmentation accuracy. Post-processing techniques, including clustering and rule-based thresholding, are applied to refine the semantic segmentation results. Proximity detection is applied using spatial queries based on a KDTree structure to assess potential risks of vegetation near power lines. Furthermore, a digital twin of the power distribution network and surrounding trees is developed by integrating 3D object registration and surface generation, enriching it with semantic attributes and incorporating it into City Information Modeling (CIM) systems. This framework demonstrates the potential of remote sensing data integration for efficient environmental monitoring in urban infrastructure. The results of the case study on the Toronto-3D dataset demonstrate the computational efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method, presenting a promising solution for power utilities in proactive vegetation management and infrastructure planning. The optimized full 9-class model achieved an overall accuracy of 96.90% and IoU scores of 97.05% for vegetation, 88.09% for power lines, and 82.33% for poles, supporting comprehensive digital twin creation. An auxiliary 4-class model further improved targeted performance, with IoUs of 99.55% for vegetation, 88.79% for poles, and 87.18% for power lines.
Bahreini et al. (Tue,) studied this question.