Key result
Low socioeconomic position was associated with 2.1-2.2 times higher age-adjusted odds of coronary heart disease compared to high-income groups, which was only partially attenuated by risk factors.
Why the study?
Does low socioeconomic position increase the risk of coronary heart disease independent of behavior-related risk factors in adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=48,592)
Does low socioeconomic position increase the risk of coronary heart disease independent of behavior-related risk factors in adults?
Socioeconomic differences in coronary heart disease risk are only partially explained by traditional behavior-related risk factors, suggesting interventions targeting these factors alone will not eliminate the socioeconomic gradient.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Risk factor modification alone may not close socioeconomic CHD gaps; leaves open structural determinants for prospective study.
OBJECTIVES: We examined the associations between socioeconomic position, co-occurrence of behavior-related risk factors, and the effect of these factors on the relative and absolute socioeconomic gradients in coronary heart disease. METHODS: We obtained the socioeconomic position of 9337 men and 39,255 women who were local government employees aged 17-65 years from employers' records (the Public Sector Study, Finland). A questionnaire survey in 2000-2002 was used to collect data about smoking, heavy alcohol consumption, physical inactivity, obesity, and prevalence of coronary heart disease (myocardial infarction or angina diagnosed by a doctor). RESULTS: The age-adjusted odds of coronary heart disease were 2.1-2.2 times higher for low-income groups than high-income groups for both men and women, and adjustment for risk factors attenuated these associations by 13%-29%. There was no further attenuation with additional adjustment for the number of co-occurring risk factors, although socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with the co-occurrence of multiple risk factors. The absolute difference in coronary heart disease risk between socioeconomic groups could not be attributed to the measured risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to reduce adult behavior-related risk factors may not completely remove socioeconomic differences in relative or absolute coronary heart disease risk, although they would lessen these effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kivimäki et al. (2007) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary heart disease (n=48,592). Low socioeconomic position vs. High socioeconomic position was evaluated on Prevalence of coronary heart disease (myocardial infarction or angina diagnosed by a doctor) (OR 2.1-2.2). Low socioeconomic position was associated with 2.1-2.2 times higher age-adjusted odds of coronary heart disease compared to high-income groups, which was only partially attenuated by risk factors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: