Over the past few years, many low-cost pollution sensors have been integrated into measurement platforms for air quality monitoring. However, using these sensors is challenging: concentrations of toxic substances in ambient air often lie at sensors' sensitivity boundaries, environmental conditions affect the sensor measurements, and the sensors often suffer from poor selectivity, i.e. are cross-sensitive to multiple pollutants. Datasheet information on these effects is scarce or may not cover deployment conditions. Consequently the sensors need to undergo extensive pre-deployment testing to examine their feasibility for a given application and to find the optimal measurement setup that allows accurate data collection and calibration. In this work, we propose a novel method to conduct in-field testing of low-cost sensors. The algorithm proposed is based on multiple least-squares and leverages the physical variation of urban air pollution to quantify the amount of explained and unexplained sensor signal. We verify (i) whether a sensor is feasible for air quality monitoring in a given environment and underpin our analysis with positive and negative examples of sensors available on the market, (ii) model sensor cross-sensitivities to interfering gases and environmental effects and (iii) compute the optimal sensor array and its calibration parameters for stable and accurate sensor measurements over long time periods in a given environment. Finally, we provide an experimental evaluation of our approach using over 9 million measurements of various low-cost sensors collected in an urban area. Based on the results from our testing methodology we propose an optimized sensor array setup. Further, we show---compared to a state-of-the-art calibration technique---a significantly lower calibration error with better long-time stability of the calibration parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maag et al. (2016) studied this question.