Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tracking change in rural communities over time is difficult. It is also important. If we are to understand what forms of peasant poverty persist, or how and in what ways peasant communities can become richer, then we require longitudinal studies. These are however few. It is difficult to access the data required for them. I present one case using assets to track growing prosperity. I examine why exclusions in other data make tracking assets important, and the limitations of longitudinal research for capturing contemporary conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dan Brockington (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: