Why the study?
Does warfarin reduce thromboembolic complications compared to dipyridamole in patients with a Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis?
Does warfarin reduce thromboembolic complications compared to dipyridamole in patients with a Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis?
Warfarin significantly reduces thromboembolic complications compared to dipyridamole in patients with a Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis, demonstrating that anticoagulation is indicated for all patients with this prosthesis.
Supports anticoagulation in Björk-Shiley recipients; observational data leave open need for randomized confirmation.
From September 1972 to January 1975, 390 patients underwent valve replacement using the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis. For the group as a whole hospital mortality was 13.3 per cent and was lowest in those undergoing isolated mitral or aortic valve replacement (5.3 and 9.4%, respectively). Available for follow-up were 209 patients of whom 123 were maintained on dipyridamole and 96 on warfarin. Thromboembolic complications were significantly (P less than 0.01) commoner in the dipyridamole (28 of 123, 22%) than warfarin (6 of 86, 7%) treated group. In the dipyridamole treated group the incidence of thromboembolic complications was similar whichever valve was replaced and thromboembolic complications were responsible for 14 of the 28 late deaths. In the warfarin treated group thromboembolic complications only occurred in patients with a mitral prosthesis. Anticoagulation is indicated for all patients with this prosthesis wherever inserted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sutton et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: