Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Within the author’s long-term project of updating John Rawls’s paradigm of “political liberalism” to a historical context different from the original one, this paper focuses on how political liberalism can help us understand populism and help liberal democracy survive the populist upsurge. In the first section, political liberalism is argued to be of help in directing our attention to three constitutive aspects of all sorts of populism: the conflation of “the people” with the electorate and the electorate with the nation, the attribution of constituent power to the electorate, and a penchant for so-called “justified intolerance.” In the second section, enfeebled democracies and postliberal democracies are discussed as two distinctly dangerous outcomes of populist contagion. Finally, in the third section the containment of populism is argued to require targeting the socioeconomic factors undergirding the populist upsurge (the rise of inequality and the absolute power of financial markets) and the jettisoning of two dogmas, shared within progressive circles: the stigma on consumption and the mistrust of the law.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alessandro Ferrara (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: