Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study the evolution of linear density fluctuations of free-streaming massive neutrinos at redshift of $z<1000$, with an explicit justification on the use of a fluid approximation. We solve the collisionless Boltzmann equation in an Einstein de-Sitter (EdS) universe, truncating the Boltzmann hierarchy at lmax=1 and 2, and compare the resulting density contrast of neutrinos δ_νᶠˡᵘⁱᵈ with that of the exact solutions of the Boltzmann equation that we derive in this paper. Roughly speaking, the fluid approximation is accurate if neutrinos were already nonrelativistic when the neutrino density fluctuation of a given wave number entered the horizon. We find that the fluid approximation is accurate at subpercent levels for massive neutrinos with m_ν>0.05 eV at the scale of k1.0h Mpc^-1 and redshift of $z<100$. This result validates the use of the fluid approximation, at least for the most massive species of neutrinos suggested by the neutrino oscillation experiments. We also find that the density contrast calculated from fluid equations (i.e., continuity and Euler equations) becomes a better approximation at a lower redshift, and the accuracy can be further improved by including an anisotropic stress term in the Euler equation. The anisotropic stress term effectively increases the pressure term by a factor of $9/5$.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shoji et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: