Key result
Pacemapping demonstrated excellent spatial resolution but had limited value for identifying successful accessory pathway ablation sites, yielding a positive prediction accuracy of only 49%.
Why the study?
Does pacemapping accurately predict successful ablation sites in patients with overt accessory pathways?
Observational (n=46)
Does pacemapping accurately predict successful ablation sites in patients with overt accessory pathways?
Despite excellent spatial resolution, pacemapping has limited clinical utility for identifying successful ablation sites of accessory pathways.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pacemapping should not guide accessory pathway ablation site selection; leaves open the need for improved mapping strategies in electrophysiology.
The objectives of this study were: (1) to evaluate quantitatively the spatial resolution of pacemapping; and (2) to assess the predictive value and role of pacemapping for the catheter ablation of overt APs. Sixty-three unipolar leads were used instead of the standard 12-lead ECG to acquire more information and assess the intrinsic accuracy of pacemapping. Spatial resolution was evaluated in 19 patients for whom data were recorded during bipolar ventricular pacing near the AV ring using the three electrode pairs of a quadripolar ablation catheter with a 5-mm interelectrode spacing. The predictive value was assessed in 27 patients with overt APs who underwent RF ablation; their data were recorded during pacing at the site of successful ablation and at one or two sites where RF energy delivery was ineffective. Data from different beats were compared visually by using body surface potential maps and quantitatively by computing average correlation coefficients (r). Reproducibility was high for paced beats (r = 0.98 +/- 0.02). Displacements of 5 mm of the pacing site could be detected with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 87%. Correlation between pacing at successful ablation sites and preexcited sinus rhythm was low (r = 0.79 +/- 0.11) and the ablation outcome could be predicted with a negative prediction accuracy of 87% and a positive prediction accuracy of 49%. Despite an excellent spatial resolution, pacemapping is of limited value for the identification of successful AP ablation sites, probably because APs can be interrupted at some distance from their ventricular insertion point.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Molin et al. (1997) conducted an observational in Overt accessory pathways (n=46). Pacemapping was evaluated on Spatial resolution and predictive value of pacemapping for successful ablation sites. Pacemapping demonstrated excellent spatial resolution but had limited value for identifying successful accessory pathway ablation sites, yielding a positive prediction accuracy of only 49%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: