Key result
System response time and its variability significantly affected user performance error rates (p<.05) but did not significantly alter mean blood pressure or heart rate.
p-value: p=<.05
Long and variable system response times may negatively affect user performance, though they did not significantly impact mean blood pressure or heart rate in this simulated task.
Long or variable delays may raise errors without hemodynamic effects; leaves open real-world clinical relevance.
With the advent of time-shared interactive systems, the psychological impact of system response time (SRT) and SRT variability (SRTV) has become an important issue. Carbonell, et. al. (1968) have suggested that both SRT and SRTV may influence system user performance and satisfaction. A number of studies have been reported that address this issue, but results have been mixed. In this experiment, twenty subjects ( Ss) executed keyboard entries to control the temperature of a simulated industrial process via time-shared process control computer. Temperature was displayed in analog form on a CRT. The task was to maintain the temperature within upper and lower bounds that were clearly indicated on the display. The experimental design consisted of repeated measures with SRT and SRTV as experimental factors. Three SRT's were employed (2, 6 and 10 seconds) with two levels of SRTV (σ 2 = 0 and σ 2 = 0.33 seconds). Mean blood pressure (MBP) and heart rate (HR) were continuously monitored during experimental conditions. Task errors were defined as temperature excursions beyond the displayed bounds. Significant main effects were not obtained for MBP or HR. Significant differences for error rate (performance) were noted for SRT ( F(2, 15) = 23.10, p < .05), subjects x SRT ( F37, 15) = 1.66, p < .001), and SRT x SRTV ( F(1, 15) = 13.14, p < .05). Error data are consistent with the Carbonell et. al. suggestion that long and variable SRT may affect user performance. The results are discussed in terms of their incongruity with current literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weiss et al. (1982) studied Psychophysiological stress (n=20). System response time (SRT) and SRT variability (SRTV) vs. Internal comparison (repeated measures) was evaluated on Mean blood pressure, heart rate, and task errors (p=<.05). System response time and its variability significantly affected user performance error rates (p<.05) but did not significantly alter mean blood pressure or heart rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: