Why the study?
Clinical characteristics and prognosis across heart failure phenotypes in community-based populations using electronic medical records remained to be described.
Does the lack of a conclusive echocardiography at diagnosis affect 1-year all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure?
Cohort (n=8,775)
Yes
Does the lack of a conclusive echocardiography at diagnosis affect 1-year all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure?
Effect estimate: HR 1.27 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.37)
Absolute Event Rate: 42% vs 30%
A significant proportion of heart failure patients lack a conclusive echocardiography at diagnosis, which is associated with a 27% higher risk of 1-year all-cause mortality compared to those with a confirmed ejection fraction phenotype.
OBJECTIVES: To describe clinical characteristics and prognosis related to heart failure (HF) phenotypes in a community-based population by applying a novel algorithm to obtain ejection fractions (EF) from electronic medical records. DESIGN: Retrospective population-based cohort study. SETTING: Data were collected for all patients with HF in Southwest Sweden. The region consists of three acute care hospitals, 40 inpatient wards, 2 emergency departments, 30 outpatient specialty clinics and 48 primary healthcare. PARTICIPANTS: 8902 patients had an HF diagnosis based on the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision during the study period. Patients <18 years as well as patients declining to participate were excluded resulting in a study population of 8775 patients. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was distribution of HF phenotypes by echocardiography. The secondary outcome measures were 1 year all-cause mortality and HR for all-cause mortality using Cox regression models. RESULTS: Out of 8775 patients with HF, 5023 (57%) had a conclusive echocardiography distributed into HF with reduced EF (35%), HF with mildly reduced EF (27%) and HF with preserved EF (38%). A total of 43% of the cohort did not have a conclusive echocardiography, and therefore no defined phenotype (HF-NDP). One-year all-cause mortality was 42% within the HF-NDP group and 30% among those with a conclusive EF. The HR of all-cause mortality in the HF-NDP group was 1.27 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.37) when compared with the confirmed EF group. There was no significant difference in survival within the HF phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: This population-based study showed a distribution of HF phenotypes that varies from those in selected HF registries, with fewer patients with HF with reduced EF and more patients with HF with preserved EF. Furthermore, 1-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher among patients with HF who had not undergone a conclusive echocardiography at diagnosis, highlighting the importance of correct diagnostic procedure to improve treatment strategies and outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davidge et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=8,775). No defined phenotype (no conclusive echocardiography) vs. Confirmed ejection fraction (conclusive echocardiography) was evaluated on 1-year all-cause mortality (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.37).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: