The authors attempted to replicate and extend D. M. Kivlighan and P. Shaughnessy's (2000) findings of (a) 3 distinctive patterns of alliance development across sessions and (b) a differential association of one of these, a U-shaped quadratic growth pattern, with positive treatment outcome. In data drawn from a clinical trial of brief psychotherapies for depression (N = 79 clients), the authors distinguished 4 patterns of alliance development. These matched 2 of Kivlighan and Shaughnessy's patterns, but not the U-shaped pattern, and none was differentially associated with outcome. However, further examination of the data identified a subset of clients (n = 17) who experienced rupture-repair sequences-brief V-shaped deflections rather than U-shaped profiles. These clients tended to make greater gains in treatment than did the other clients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stiles et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: