Key result
A portable ECG computer algorithm for prehospital thrombolysis in patients with chest pain demonstrated 99.6% specificity and 54% sensitivity, saving an average of 47 minutes.
Why the study?
Does a portable ECG computer system algorithm improve the speed and reliability of identifying patients for prehospital thrombolysis in patients with chest pain?
Observational (n=1,251)
Does a portable ECG computer system algorithm improve the speed and reliability of identifying patients for prehospital thrombolysis in patients with chest pain?
Computer-aided prehospital ECG analysis is fast and highly specific for identifying patients for at-home thrombolytic therapy, saving an average of 47 minutes to treatment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change prehospital practice; leaves open need for randomized outcome trials.
The gain in survival by thrombolytic therapy in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) is determined by the delay between coronary occlusion and reperfusion. Patient selection requires electrocardiogram (ECG) confirmation of extensive myocardial ischemia. In the REPAIR study a small portable ECG computer system is used to analyze the ECG 'on the spot'. A specially developed algorithm is used to identify patients who would benefit most from at-home thrombolysis. Of 1251 ECGs of patients with chest pain, made by the ambulance service, 188 met the criteria for prehospital treatment. These patients could be treated within 23 +or- 9 minutes after ambulance arrival. The time gained averaged 47 minutes. There were four false-positive diagnoses (false-positive ratio 0.3%). Specificity was 99.6%, whereas sensitivity in overall detection of infarction was 54%. Computer aided analysis of an ECG made on the spot proves to be both fast and reliable, making rapid initiation of at-home thrombolytic therapy possible.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
BOUTEN et al. (2002) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (n=1,251). Portable ECG computer system algorithm was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) for infarction. A portable ECG computer algorithm for prehospital thrombolysis in patients with chest pain demonstrated 99.6% specificity and 54% sensitivity, saving an average of 47 minutes.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: