Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Administered mental health patients (10 outpatients and 8 inpatients) the Eysenck Personality Inventory using computerized and manual format. In a cross-over, counterbalanced design scores for the three EPI scales did not differ between administrations. Test-retest reliability between forms was high and comparable to previous reliability reported for the manual form. It was suggested that automation of routine testing procedures may be a viable and economical alternative to traditional methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katz et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: