Key result
PBPK modeling demonstrated that heat and exercise stress increased the area under the curve by up to 130% for intravenously administered drugs with high unbound intrinsic clearance.
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling demonstrates that heat and exercise stress can significantly alter drug exposure, particularly for intravenously administered drugs with high unbound intrinsic clearance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant dosing caution for high-clearance IV drugs under stress; leaves open translation from animal PBPK models.
Under extreme conditions of heat exposure and exercise stress, the human body undergoes major physiological changes. Perturbations in organ blood flows, gastrointestinal properties, and vascular physiology may impact the body's ability to absorb, distribute, and eliminate drugs. Clinical studies on the effect of these stressors on drug pharmacokinetics demonstrate that the likelihood of pharmacokinetic alteration is dependent on drug properties and the intensity of the stressor. The objectives of this study were to use literature data to quantify the correlation between exercise and heat exposure intensity to changing physiological parameters and further, to use this information for the parameterization of a whole-body, physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for the purposes of determining those drug properties most likely to demonstrate altered drug pharmacokinetics under stress. Cardiac output and most organ blood flows were correlated with heart rate using regression analysis. Other altered parameters included hematocrit and intravascular albumin concentration. Pharmacokinetic simulations of intravenous and oral administration of hypothetical drugs with either a low or high value of lipophilicity, unbound fraction in plasma, and unbound intrinsic hepatic clearance demonstrated that the area under the curve of those drugs with a high unbound intrinsic clearance was most affected (up to a 130% increase) following intravenous administration, whereas following oral administration, pharmacokinetic changes were smaller (<40% increase in area under the curve) for all hypothetical compounds. A midazolam physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was also used to demonstrate that simulated changes in pharmacokinetic parameters under exercise and heat stress were generally consistent with those reported in the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sidhu et al. (2011) studied Heat and exercise stress. Heat and exercise stress was evaluated on Area under the curve (AUC) changes. PBPK modeling demonstrated that heat and exercise stress increased the area under the curve by up to 130% for intravenously administered drugs with high unbound intrinsic clearance.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: