PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1999Journal of Traumatic Stress145 citations

Effects of varying diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder are endorsing the concept of partial PTSD

View Full Paper
MSMatthias SchützwohlAMAndreas Maercker

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the appropriateness of different diagnostic criteria sets for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This was done by varying diagnostic criteria on the diagnosis of PTSD in a study group of N = 146 former political prisoners, and comparing the resulting diagnostic groups with a study group of N = 75 nontraumatized controls with regard to mean scores on measures of subjective distress (i.e., IES-R, BDI, BAI, SCL-90-R). The findings did not support the diagnostic boundaries as defined by the DSM-IV or the lowering of the avoidance criterion from three to two symptoms. The concept of partial PTSD appeared to be the most appropriate way to provide diagnostic coverage for those who did not meet full DSM IV criteria.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schützwohl et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a158c85cb801b7f954ea2d2https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024706702133
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper