Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In response to the challenges of globalisation, the Singapore government has introduced an array of neo-liberal educational strategies to promote two goals: (a) greater diversity and choice in the educational landscape; and (b) greater autonomy and innovation at the school level. This article argues that the Singapore government uses the tactic of performativity as a means of state control even as it implements an education policy of decentralisation. Accompanying the strategies to deregulate the education system are processes of reregulation introduced by the government to monitor and influence the thinking and behaviour of key educational stakeholders. What makes the case of Singapore interesting in the international literature is that it illustrates the tactical changes made by a small and 'vulnerable' state in Asia in an era of globalisation and convergence of educational reforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charlene Tan (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: