Key result
This review details current pharmacological and anatomical approaches to rate and rhythm control in atrial fibrillation, providing a drug selection algorithm for rate management.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review provides an overview of current approaches to rate control in atrial fibrillation, including a drug selection algorithm.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common, sustained, symptomatic tachyarrhythmia that clinicians are called upon to manage. Management strategies include ventricular rate control coupled with anticoagulation, versus restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm. Rate control may be achieved pharmacologically, with agents that impair AV nodal conduction directly and/or by increasing parasympathetic/sympathetic balance, or by modifying or ablating the AV nodal region anatomically. Rhythm control may be achieved by electrical or pharmacological conversion followed by maintenance of sinus rhythm by pharmacological (or occasionally ablative) therapies. This article will present current approaches to rate and rhythm control issues in AF. Part 1, the current manuscript, details approaches to rate control and includes a drug selection algorithmic conclusion. It also introduces the subject of the pursuit of sinus rhythm. Parts 2 and 3, to be published in subsequent editions of PACE, will deal with therapeutic measures to restore and maintain sinus rhythm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blitzer et al. (1998) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Pharmacological therapy for rate and rhythm control was evaluated. This review details current pharmacological and anatomical approaches to rate and rhythm control in atrial fibrillation, providing a drug selection algorithm for rate management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: