Recently a new method for determining the neutrino mass hierarchy by comparing the effective values of the atmospheric Δm² measured in the electron neutrino disappearance channel, Δm²(ee), with the one measured in the muon neutrino disappearance channel, Δm²(μμ), was proposed. If Δm²(ee) is larger (smaller) than Δm²(μμ) the hierarchy is of the normal (inverted) type. We reexamine this proposition in the light of two very high precision measurements: Δm²(μμ) that may be accomplished by the phase II of the Tokai-to-Kamioka (T2K) experiment, for example, and Δm²(ee) that can be envisaged using the novel M\"ossbauer enhanced resonant νₑ absorption technique. Under optimistic assumptions for the systematic uncertainties of both measurements, we estimate the parameter region of (θ₁₃, δ) in which the mass hierarchy can be determined. If θ₁₃ is relatively large, sin²2θ₁₃0.05, and both of Δm²(ee) and Δm²(μμ) can be measured with the precision of ~0.5% it is possible to determine the neutrino mass hierarchy at $>95%$ CL for 0.3πδ1.7π for the current best fit values of all the other oscillation parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Minakata et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: