Intelligent wearable devices and the Internet of things (IoT) require on-chip SRAM macros with (1) compact area to reduce costs; (2) single supply voltage (VDD) and low minimum VDD (VDDmin) to reduce power consumption; and (3) sufficient speed to facilitate real-time computing. 6T SRAM is compact, but suffers write failure and half-select (HS) disturbance in read/write cycles at low VDD. Previous studies have sought to improve the write margin (WM)of SRAMs by (a) lowering the cell-VDD (CVDD) voltage (=VDD-ΔV <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">cVVD</inf> ) [1]-[3] (CVDD-D) at the expense of degradation in cell stability (static noise margin, SNM) for CVDD-HS cells; or (b) using negative-bitline (NBL) voltage (=VSS-V <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">NBL</inf> ) [1,4-6] for cross-point assist at the expense of increased area and power overhead due to the inclusion of pumping capacitors (C <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">NBL</inf> ). Wordline (WL) voltage under-drive (WLUD, V <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">WL</inf> =VDD-V <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">WLUD</inf> ) is commonly used in 6T SRAMs [2-5] to improve HS/read SNM during read/write cycles; however, this tends to degrade WM and cell read current (I <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">CELL</inf> ), resulting in slower read/cycle speeds and necessitating an increase in ΔV <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">CVDD</inf> or V <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">NBL</inf> (C <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">NBL</inf> ). The maximum ΔV <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">CVDD</inf> is limited by the hold SNM of CVDD-HS cells. Large C <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">NBL</inf> results in large area and power overhead, particularly in macros with wide I/O and small amount of column-multiplexing (Y-mux). Thus, HS-SNM tradeoffs in l <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">CELL</inf> and WM have not yet been solved for 6T cells, except by adding additional transistors (i.e., 8T to 10T).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: