Key result
Ultrahigh-resolution mapping links typical atrial flutter to greater partial right atrial posterior wall block.
Why the study?
The right atrial posterior wall forms a conduction barrier during typical atrial flutter, but its transverse conduction properties in patients with and without typical flutter were not fully defined.
Does the transverse conduction of the right atrial posterior wall differ between patients with and without typical atrial flutter?
Observational (n=41)
Does the transverse conduction of the right atrial posterior wall differ between patients with and without typical atrial flutter?
Ultrahigh resolution mapping reveals that transverse conduction block in the right atrial posterior wall is lower-side dominant and more pronounced in patients with typical atrial flutter.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May refine mapping strategies in atrial flutter; hypothesis-generating for posterior wall conduction mechanisms.
INTRODUCTION: The right atrial posterior wall (RAPW) is known to form a conduction barrier during typical atrial flutter (AFL). We evaluated the transverse conduction properties of RAPW in patients with and without typical AFL using an ultrahigh resolution electroanatomical mapping system. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 41 patients who underwent catheter ablation of AF, typical or atypical AFL, in whom we performed RAPW mapping with an ultrahigh resolution mapping system during typical AFL and coronary sinus ostial pacing with three different pacing cycle lengths (PCLs) (1) PCL1: PCL within 40 ms of the AFL cycle length in patients with typical AFL or 250-300 ms for those without, (2) PCL2: 400 ms, (3) PCL3: PCL just faster than the sinus rate. Local RAPW conduction block was evaluated by propagation mapping and local double potentials separated by an isoelectric line. The functional block was defined as areas blocked during shorter PCLs but conductive during longer PCLs. The degree of blockade was calculated by dividing the blocked length by RAPW length (%blockade). Only two patients demonstrated a fixed complete RAPW block (100%, %blockade). Thirty-one patients demonstrated a partial block of RAPW, and the %blockade during PCL1-3 was 49.4 ± 19.8%, 39.5 ± 19.2%, and 35.0 ± 22.9% in this group, respectively. Functional block areas were frequently observed above the fixed block area adjacent to the RA-inferior vena cava junction. Transverse conduction block was more frequently observed in patients with typical AFL at any longitudinal level of RAPW. CONCLUSION: RAPW transverse conduction block is lower-side dominant and greater in patients with typical AFL than those without.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sekihara et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (n=41). Ultrahigh resolution electroanatomical mapping vs. Patients without typical atrial flutter was evaluated on Degree of right atrial posterior wall blockade (%blockade). Ultrahigh resolution mapping revealed partial right atrial posterior wall block in 31 of 41 patients (49.4% blockade at shortest pacing), which was greater in those with typical atrial flutter.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: