In seven years of WTO dispute settlement (1995–2001), six panels appointed scientific experts, 2 two panels requested expert advice from other international organisations 3 and one panel nominated a linguistic expert. 4 Under GATT 1947, in contrast, only one panel saw the need to seek expert advice. 5 Very often also the parties to a WTO dispute nominate experts on their delegation, be they lawyers, economists, scientists or linguists. In addition, an increasing number of ‘outsiders’ or amici curiae , such as NGOs, but also industry and academics, have pressed their (expert) opinion on WTO panels and the Appellate Body.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joost Pauwelyn (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: