Key result
Rosuvastatin is linked to ~30% higher QT prolongation risk, unlike atorvastatin.
Why the study?
The risks, mechanisms, and effects of rosuvastatin-induced QT prolongation remained unclear.
Does rosuvastatin increase the risk of QT prolongation and all-cause mortality compared to atorvastatin or no exposure?
Case-Control (n=444,582)
No
Does rosuvastatin increase the risk of QT prolongation and all-cause mortality compared to atorvastatin or no exposure?
Rosuvastatin is associated with an increased risk of QT prolongation compared to atorvastatin, but this does not translate to an increased risk of long-term all-cause mortality.
Drug-induced QT prolongation is attributed to several mechanisms, including hERG channel blockage. However, the risks, mechanisms, and the effects of rosuvastatin-induced QT prolongation remain unclear. Therefore, this study assessed the risk of rosuvastatin-induced QT prolongation using (1) real-world data with two different settings, namely case-control and retrospective cohort study designs; (2) laboratory experiments using human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CM); (3) nationwide claim data for mortality risk evaluation. Real-world data showed an association between QT prolongation and the use of rosuvastatin (OR [95% CI], 1.30 [1.21-1.39]) but not for atorvastatin (OR [95% CI], 0.98 [0.89-1.07]). Rosuvastatin also affected the sodium and calcium channel activities of cardiomyocytes in vitro. However, rosuvastatin exposure was not associated with a high risk of all-cause mortality (HR [95% CI], 0.95 [0.89-1.01]). Overall, these results suggest that rosuvastatin use increased the risk of QT prolongation in real-world settings, significantly affecting the action potential of hiPSC-CMs in laboratory settings. Long-term rosuvastatin treatment was not associated with mortality. In conclusion, while our study links rosuvastatin use to potential QT prolongation and possible influence on the action potential of hiPSC-CMs, long-term use does not show increased mortality, necessitating further research for conclusive real-world applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koo et al. (2023) conducted a case-control in QT prolongation (n=444,582). Rosuvastatin vs. Atorvastatin was evaluated on QT prolongation (QTc > 450 ms for males and 460 ms for females) (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.21-1.39, p=<0.001). Rosuvastatin use was significantly associated with an increased risk of QT prolongation (OR 1.30) in a real-world setting, whereas atorvastatin use was not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: