Key result
Advances in atrial fibrillation treatments, including dronedarone, dabigatran, and catheter ablation, offer the potential to shift management toward improving long-term outcomes.
New treatments for atrial fibrillation, including dronedarone, dabigatran, and catheter ablation, may shift management paradigms towards improving long-term outcomes rather than just symptom suppression.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May encourage outcome-focused AF strategies; leaves open prospective validation in trials.
INTRODUCTION: The Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Exchange Group, an international multidisciplinary group concerned with the management of AF, was convened to review recent advances in the field and the potential impact on treatment strategies. METHODS: Issues discussed included epidemiology and the impact of the rising incidence of AF on health care systems, developments in pharmacological and surgical interventions in the management of arrhythmias and thromboprophylaxis, the potential to affect treatment strategies, and barriers to implementing them. RESULTS: The incidence of AF and the associated burden on health care systems are increasing with aging populations, prevalence of comorbidities and more effective treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Advances in available medical treatments, in particular dronedarone and dabigatran, with other products in development, offer the possibility of changes in treatment paradigms and a greater emphasis on reducing hospitalizations and improvement in long-term outcomes instead of a symptom/safety-driven approach in which the priority is symptom suppression without provoking drug toxicity. Developments in catheter ablation techniques may mean that, in experienced centers, ablation may be offered as first-line treatment in selected patient populations. Barriers to optimal treatment include underdiagnosis, lack of recognition as a serious condition and as a risk factor for stroke, limited access to care, inadequate implementation of guidelines, and poor adherence to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The focus of the management of AF may be changing as a consequence of new treatments based on the outcome improvements they offer. However, the benefits will not be fully realized if guidelines and guidance are not observed in routine clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prystowsky et al. (2010) conducted a review in Atrial Fibrillation. New treatments (dronedarone, dabigatran, catheter ablation) was evaluated. Advances in atrial fibrillation treatments, including dronedarone, dabigatran, and catheter ablation, offer the potential to shift management toward improving long-term outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: