Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Studies of pre-Depression banking argue that banking panics resulted from depositor confusion about the incidence of shocks, and that interbank cooperation avoided unwarranted failures. The Great Depression --with its concentration of bank failures at particular times and places -has been viewed as an exception. The June 1932 Chicago panic was a dramatic example of a banking panic during the Great Depression. This paper uses individual bank data to address the question of whether solvent Chicago banks failed during the panic as the result of confusion by depositors. Chicago banks are divided into three groups: panic failures, failures outside the panic window, and survivors. The characteristics of these three groups are compared to determine whether the banks that failed during the panic were similar cx ante to those that survived the panic or whether they shared characteristics with other banks that failed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calomiris et al. (1994) studied this question.