Key result
Coincident intracranial aneurysm does not affect 3-month functional outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke.
Why the study?
Does mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients with a coincident intracranial aneurysm on the target vessel result in similar functional outcomes compared to patients without an aneurysm?
Case-Control (n=520)
Yes
Does mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients with a coincident intracranial aneurysm on the target vessel result in similar functional outcomes compared to patients without an aneurysm?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mechanical thrombectomy is an effective option for acute ischemic stroke patients with a coincident intracranial aneurysm on the target vessel, though the 5.8% risk of rupture requires careful procedural planning.
BACKGROUND: The presence of a coincident intracranial aneurysm (CIA) on the target vessel of patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) poses challenges, as the benefits and risks of the procedure in this scenario remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MT in AIS cases with a CIA on the target vessel. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 14 stroke centers in France and Switzerland between January 2015 and January 2023. We identified AIS cases with CIA on the target vessel treated with MT. The control population was constituted from the ETIS registry (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke), including AIS patients treated with MT in the same centers during the same period, and were matched (1:4) on age (±1 year) and sex. The primary outcome was favorable functional status at 3 months, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤2 or equal to pre-stroke mRS. RESULTS: A total of 104 MT-treated patients with at least one CIA on the target vessel and 416 MT-treated patients without CIA were analyzed. Despite an aneurysm rupture occurring in 5.8% of cases, no significant differences were observed in favorable functional outcome at 3 months between the CIA and control groups (42.4% vs 41.0%; adjusted OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.97). Similarly, recanalization rates (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) ≥2b at end of MT) did not differ significantly (90.0% vs 85.9%; adjusted OR 1.75, 95% CI 0.77 to 3.95). CONCLUSION: MT is an effective option for AIS patients, even with CIA on the target vessel, but the risk of rupture underscores the need for procedural planning. Future studies should further explore size and location criteria to optimize patient selection and orientation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Combeau et al. (2025) conducted a case-control in Acute ischemic stroke (n=520). Coincident intracranial aneurysm (CIA) on the target vessel vs. No coincident intracranial aneurysm was evaluated on Favorable functional status at 3 months (mRS ≤2 or equal to pre-stroke mRS) (adjusted OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.97). The presence of a coincident intracranial aneurysm during mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke did not significantly affect favorable functional outcomes at 3 months (42.4% vs 41.0%; adjusted OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.72-1.97).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: