Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Given the adjacency matrix of the graph, the algorithm presented in this paper finds a spanning tree and then constructs the set of fundamental cycles. Our algorithm is slower than an algorithm presented by Welch by a ratio of N /3 ( N is the number of nodes) but requires less storage. For graphs with a large number of nodes and edges, when storage is limited our algorithm is superior to Welch's; however, when the graphs are small, or machine storage is very large, Welch's algorithm is superior. Timing estimates and storage requirements for both methods are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gotlieb et al. (1967) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: