Two methods for generating smoothing splines are compared and applied to data from a fed‐batch fermentation process. One method chose both the degree of the spline and its parameters by minimizing the generalized cross validation (GCV) function using a genetic algorithm (GA). The other method adjusted the smoothing spline to a specified chi‐square goodness‐of‐fit, requiring prior knowledge of the measurement variability. The GCV/GA method led to excellent results with all the fermentation data records. The goodness‐of‐fit method gave a family of spline fits; splines with a low percentage fit extracted trends from the data, while for general use a 50% fit appeared satisfactory. The goodness‐of‐fit method executed more quickly than the GCV/GA method, but the GCV/GA method was more generally applicable as it chose both the degree of the spline and the amount of smoothing automatically.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thornhill et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: