Key result
CNNs localize AF drivers from simulated body surface potentials with ~93% accuracy.
Why the study?
ECGI inverse problem solving requires complex torso and atrial modeling, and most deep learning methods for AF do not estimate ablation targets.
CNNs applied to body surface potentials can accurately identify AF driver locations in computerized models when assuming time independence, though performance drops significantly when accounting for temporal blocks.
May advance noninvasive AF driver localization; leaves open human validation before clinical adoption.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is characterized by complex and irregular propagation patterns, and AF onset locations and drivers responsible for its perpetuation are the main targets for ablation procedures. ECG imaging (ECGI) has been demonstrated as a promising tool to identify AF drivers and guide ablation procedures, being able to reconstruct the electrophysiological activity on the heart surface by using a non-invasive recording of body surface potentials (BSP). However, the inverse problem of ECGI is ill-posed, and it requires accurate mathematical modeling of both atria and torso, mainly from CT or MR images. Several deep learning-based methods have been proposed to detect AF, but most of the AF-based studies do not include the estimation of ablation targets. In this study, we propose to model the location of AF drivers from BSP as a supervised classification problem using convolutional neural networks (CNN). Accuracy in the test set ranged between 0.75 (SNR = 5 dB) and 0.93 (SNR = 20 dB upward) when assuming time independence, but it worsened to 0.52 or lower when dividing AF models into blocks. Therefore, CNN could be a robust method that could help to non-invasively identify target regions for ablation in AF by using body surface potential mapping, avoiding the use of ECGI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cámara-Vázquez et al. (2021) studied Atrial Fibrillation (n=130). Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) was evaluated on Accuracy of AF driver localization in the test set (time independence, SNR = 20 dB). Convolutional neural networks accurately estimated atrial fibrillation driver positions from simulated body surface potentials, achieving up to 93% accuracy when assuming time independence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: