Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Maximum‐likelihood estimation is interpreted as a procedure for generating approximate pivotal quantities, that is, functions u ( X ;θ) of the data X and parameter θ that have distributions not involving θ. Further, these pivotals should be efficient in the sense of reproducing approximately the likelihood function of θ based on X , and they should be approximately linear in θ. To this end the effect of replacing θ by a parameter ϕ = ϕ(θ) is examined. The relationship of maximum‐likelihood estimation interpreted in this way to conditional inference is discussed. Examples illustrating this use of maximum‐likelihood estimation on small samples are given.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sprott et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: