Why the study?
Do NOACs increase the risk of myocardial infarction in patients requiring anticoagulation?
Meta-Analysis
Do NOACs increase the risk of myocardial infarction in patients requiring anticoagulation?
This meta-analysis suggests that NOACs do not increase the risk of myocardial infarction, alleviating previous safety concerns, though more data is needed for high-risk patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reassures clinicians on NOAC safety for anticoagulation without MI concern; confirms pooled evidence while leaving high-risk subgroups open.
INTRODUCTION: Since the approval and commercialization of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs; apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) several studies and meta-analyses have raised safety concerns regarding myocardial infarction (MI) risk among NOAC-treated patients, particularly with dabigatran. Uncertainty remains regarding the coronary risk associated with dabigatran, and whether this putative risk also applies to the other NOACs. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the coronary risks of NOACs based on findings from placebo-controlled trials are discussed, and randomized controlled trials and major cohort studies in AF patients are also appraised. We performed a random-effect meta-analysis, including both interventional trials and observational studies ("real-world" data). Further estimates were retrieved from the meta-analysis of coronary risk among NOAC-treated patients with concomitant AF and coronary disease. EXPERT OPINION: Currently, the best available data from both clinical trials and observational studies do not support the claim that patients treated with NOACs, including dabigatran, are at increased coronary risk. However, a definitive conclusion cannot be made (especially regarding dabigatran) and further data are required to address the coronary risks, mostly of high-risk patients. As with any therapeutic intervention, the possible complications should be balanced against the potential benefits at an individual patient level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caldeira et al. (2016) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation. NOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) was evaluated on Myocardial infarction (MI) / coronary risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: