Context: Systematic mapping studies (SMS) are adopted in Software Engineering (SE) to select and synthesize relevant literature on a research topic and, thus, support evidence-based decision-making. Performing SMS is effort-demanding and time-consuming. Hence, using tools is beneficial. Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT–4.o can potentially accelerate repetitive activities, such as data extraction in SMS, saving time and effort. Goal: We conducted this work to evaluate and provide preliminary evidence on how ChatGPT–4.o can support data extraction in SMS. Method: We performed a proof-of-concept study and assessed the results’ accuracy of using ChatGPT 4.0 to extract data in one SMS compared to the results produced manually. Results: The accuracy of ChatGPT–4.o was 87.83%. Conclusions: Our preliminary findings suggest that entirely replacing the manual data extraction with ChatGPT–4.o is not recommended. However, employing ChatGPT for semi-automated data extraction to aid in evidence synthesis in SMS is promising.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Felizardo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: