Key result
The German post-discharge coping difficulty scale shows strong validity and reliability for assessing patient experiences.
Why the study?
Patients transitioning to home after inpatient treatment face risks of adverse events, but valid and internationally comparable tools to assess post-discharge coping difficulties are lacking.
Cross-Sectional (n=775)
No
The German version of the post-discharge coping difficulty scale (PDCDS-G) is a valid and reliable two-factor instrument for assessing patient experiences and coping difficulties after hospital discharge.
Supports post-discharge coping assessment in German patients; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Patients transitioning between different care contexts are at increased risk of experiencing adverse events. In particular, being discharged to home after inpatient treatment involves significant risks. However, there is a lack of valid and internationally comparable assessment tools on patients' experiences of difficulties following hospital discharge. Therefore, this study aimed to adapt and validate the German version of the post-discharge coping difficulty scale (PDCDS-G). METHODS: Patients were recruited at a German university hospital. 815 adult patients participated in a self-report survey following an inpatient stay of at least three days. Factorial validity of the PDCDS-G was evaluated via factor analyses. Further, examination of measurement invariance was performed. To establish criterion validity, associations with patients' self-reported health status and occurrence of patient safety were determined. Further, group differences regarding patient characteristics, hospitalization factors, and survey-related variables were examined. RESULTS: Factorial validity of the PDCDS-G was confirmed by a two-factorial model with good model fit. Both factors showed good to excellent reliability. The two-factor model achieved measurement invariance across all patient characteristics, hospitalization factors, and survey-related variables. Significant relationships with patients' health status and the occurrence of patient safety incidents corroborate criterion validity of the PDCDS-G. Differential associations of the two PDCDS-G factors regarding patient characteristics, hospitalization, and survey-related variables were found. DISCUSSION: Construct and criterion validity, as well as the reliability of the PDCDS-G, were verified. Further, instrument's measurement invariance was confirmed allowing use of the scale for the interpretation of group differences and comparisons between studies. CONCLUSIONS: The PDCDS-G provides a validated and comparable patient-reported outcomes measure for patient experiences after hospital discharge to home. The PDCDS-G can be used for patient surveys in quality or patient safety improvement in care transition processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marsall et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Discharged hospital patients (n=775). German version of the post-discharge coping difficulty scale (PDCDS-G) was evaluated on Factorial validity and reliability of the PDCDS-G. The German version of the post-discharge coping difficulty scale (PDCDS-G) demonstrated strong factorial validity with a two-factor model and good to excellent reliability for assessing patient experiences after hospital discharge.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: