This paper takes the papers in this special collection as a starting point and raises issues concerning key terms, with particular emphasis on incidental . It is argued that there is no clear way to show that a word has been learned incidentally, if one means that specific attention is not drawn to that word either by some external force or by the learner. I further argue that, to understand vocabulary learning, linguists cannot limit the investigation to word meaning. Essential to a study of the lexicon is the study of syntax—in particular, the incorporation of syntactic subcategorizations. Taking all of these factors into account, a more nuanced approach to the study of incidental vocabulary learning is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Susan M. Gass (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: