Key result
PVI leaves overall Causality Pairing Index unchanged but reduces posterior wall net outflow.
Why the study?
Adjunctive posterior wall isolation to pulmonary vein isolation has not demonstrated convincing benefit during AF ablation, prompting investigation into mechanistic insights for null trials.
Does Granger Causality analysis of non-contact left atrial electro-anatomical maps provide mechanistic insight into posterior wall isolation in patients undergoing PVI for persistent AF?
Cohort (n=21)
No
Does Granger Causality analysis of non-contact left atrial electro-anatomical maps provide mechanistic insight into posterior wall isolation in patients undergoing PVI for persistent AF?
Granger Causality analysis of non-contact mapping provides mechanistic insight into the lack of benefit of routine posterior wall isolation, suggesting it may only benefit a minority of patients with net positive outflow.
May support selective over routine posterior wall isolation in persistent AF; leaves open whether Granger causality mapping identifies responders.
Abstract Background Adjunctive posterior wall isolation (PWI) to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has not demonstrated convincing benefit during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. To provide mechanistic insight for null PWI trials we undertook Granger Causality (GC) analysis of non-contact left atrial electro-anatomical maps. Objective To apply GC to intracardiac electrograms to uncover patient specific AF dynamics and describe a proof-of-concept approach to targeted PWI following PVI. Methods A prospective cohort study was undertaken at Royal Brompton Hospital. Consecutive patients undergoing PVI with non-contact mapping (AcQmap; Acutus Medical) before and after PVI were included. Results In 21 patients, Causality Pairing Index, a GC measure of organisation, was unchanged post PVI; overall 0.087±0.012 vs. 0.086±0.015, p=0.64, or by region (posterior wall (PW); 0.084±0.020 vs 0.079±0.017, p=0.20, rest of LA 0.087±0.013 vs 0.086±0.016, p=0.80). Directional dispersion, quantifying conduction heterogeneity, was lower in the PW compared to the rest of the left atrium (LA) (0.093±0.036 vs 0.11±0.043, p=0.017) and increased following PVI (0.093±0.036 vs 0.12±0.043, p=0.045), while there was no change in the rest of the LA (0.11±0.034 vs 0.11±0.030, p=0.52). PW net outflow overall decreased following PVI (pre -0.0086±0.047 vs -0.033±0.054, p=0.011) with a minority of patients exhibiting a net positive outflow from the posterior wall. Conclusion GC provides mechanistic insight into the null trials for PWI and identifies a minority of patients that may benefit. GC is positioned as a clinical decision tool to guide personalised persistent AF ablation strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barker et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=21). Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) vs. Pre-PVI baseline was evaluated on Overall Causality Pairing Index (p=0.64). Granger Causality analysis of non-contact maps showed overall Causality Pairing Index was unchanged post-PVI (0.087 vs 0.086, p=0.64), but posterior wall net outflow decreased (p=0.011).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: