Seventy-nine male subjects were used in this study to determine which proportions of maximum strength (1-RM) used in training were as effective for increasing strength as training with the 1-RM. Three groups trained twice weekly with 66, 80, or 90 percent of the 1-RM, plus one weekly effort with the 1-RM. A fourth group trained three times weekly with the 1-RM; a fifth group, with 66 percent of the 1-RM; a sixth group, with the 1-RM only once weekly; and the seventh group acted as a control. After six weeks of training, the group that trained with two-thirds of the 1-RM three times weekly and the control group had mean strength scores which were significantly less than the means of the other groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard A. Berger (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: