Key result
Universal pediatric screening identifies more missense variants than opportunistic adult screening, at 87% vs. 69%.
Why the study?
Do universal pediatric screening and opportunistic adult screening identify different phenotypic and genotypic profiles in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia?
Cross-Sectional (n=236)
Do universal pediatric screening and opportunistic adult screening identify different phenotypic and genotypic profiles in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia?
Opportunistic adult screening identifies more severe familial hypercholesterolemia phenotypes, while universal pediatric screening detects milder cases.
Background: Multiple familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) screening strategies are recommended, but how they work together within a population remains poorly understood. Here, we aimed to compare the characteristics of children diagnosed through a universal screening program with those of adults identified through opportunistic screening. Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we analyzed the clinical and genetic characteristics of children and adults with genetically confirmed heterozygous FH (HeFH). Results: ) in 77 (32.6%) patients. The combined screening approach identified 44 disease-causing variants, of which 2 and 25 were unique to the adult and pediatric cohort, respectively. The proportion of children with missense variants was significantly higher (172 [87.3%] vs. 27 [69.2%]; p = 0.005), whereas the proportion of termination variants was significantly lower (20 [10.2%] vs. 11 [28.2%]; p = 0.002) compared to the adult group. Adults had higher adjusted low-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared to children. Conclusions: Our study suggests that opportunistic adult screening identifies more severe FH phenotypes, while universal pediatric screening detects milder cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Šikonja et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) (n=236). Universal pediatric screening vs. Opportunistic adult screening was evaluated on Proportion of missense variants (p=0.005). Universal pediatric screening identified a significantly higher proportion of missense variants compared to opportunistic adult screening (87.3% vs. 69.2%; p=0.005), suggesting it detects milder cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: