We compared the nitric oxide (.NO)-releasing characteristics of two NO donors, the S-nitroso adduct of bovine serum albumin (BSANO) and the S-nitroso adduct of L-glutathione (GSNO). In oxygenated phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and in hemoglobin solution, both NO donors released .NO only in the presence of a low molecular weight thiol (the most active was L-cysteine). The requirement of thiol to release .NO strongly suggests that a transnitrosation reaction occurs between the S-nitroso adduct of the NO donor and the sulfhydryl group of the NO acceptor. The reaction produced a labile S-nitroso-L-cysteine intermediate that released .NO. As shown by spin-trapping experiments, the transnitrosation reaction involved the formation of .NO (trapped by 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl 3-oxide) and .S radicals (trapped by 5,5'-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide) of both the NO donors and the NO acceptor (L-cysteine). The reaction leading to .S radical formation was distinct from the transnitrosation reaction, since it was oxygen-dependent. We suggest that .S radicals are formed from oxidizing species produced after a reaction between .NO and molecular oxygen (.NO2 is a likely candidate). As for pure .NO gas, the major oxidation product of NO donors, in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), was NO2-, with no formation of NO3-. In the presence of oxyhemoglobin, both NO donors produced only NO3-. BSANO and GSNO showed distinct patterns of .NO release both in phosphate buffer and in the presence of hemoglobin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pietraforte et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: